Ultima actualizare:
octombrie 8, 2023
Autor: Krisztián SZABÓ
Publicat în: Journal Of Eastern European Criminal Law no. 2/2014
Revistă disponibilă: aici.…
[vezi tot]Autor: Nyitrai ENDRE
Publicat în: Journal Of Eastern European Criminal Law no. 1/2015
Revistă disponibilă: aici.
Abstract: The most efficient means of the fight against organized crime are witness protection provisions. Witnesses have key importance in eliminating criminal organizations as the court can use their declarations as an evidence. The testimony of the witness can base enforcing investigation, furthermore the criminal impeachment of the perpetrators. The aim of this study is to show the means of witness protection, which allows us to fight against criminal organizations effectively.
Keywords: organized crime; witness protection; gathering information; threat; influence. …
[vezi tot]Autor: Ioan GRIGA
Publicat în: Revista Universul Juridic nr. 11/2015
Disponibil online: aici.
Titlul lucrării în engleză: Considerations regarding the procedural act establishing whether and when the court grants the benefit of the legal case of the punishment reduction provided by art. 19 of Law no. 682/2002
Abstract: In this article, the author brings to the attention of the ideologists and practitioners of the criminal law an issue of high interest, raised in the criminal and procedural practice, namely that of the procedural act establishing whether and when the court grants the benefit of the legal reason for reducing punishment provided by art. 19 of Law no. [vezi tot]
Autor: Andrea KRAUT, Tibor HESZ, László KOHALMI
Publicat în: Journal Of Eastern European Criminal Law no. 2/2019
Revistă disponibilă: aici.
Abstract: One of the possible instruments of the criminal procedure in the fight against organized crime and high-level conspiracy is witness protection. Witness protection, like any law enforcement measure, has some limitations. The use of the specially protected witness in the procedure of proof raises serious problems of the rule of law, as it reduces the defendant’s freedom of defense, as the principle of the classical adversarial principle is violated. He sets foot on the barren ground, giving up the classic rule of [vezi tot]
