Ultima actualizare:
octombrie 8, 2023

Apasă aici pentru a propune un material
Cuvinte-cheie "legality of incrimination"

Infracțiunile prevăzute în art. 273 din Legea nr. 31/1990 privind societățile. Comentarii din perspectiva mixtă civilă (raporturi juridice între profesioniști) – penală

Autor: Sebastian BODU, Ciprian BODU

Publicat în: Revista Dreptul nr.4/2016

Disponibil onlineaici.

Titlul lucrării în engleză: Offences provided in Article 273 of the Law No 31/1990 on companies. Comments from the mixed civil (legal relationships between professionals) – criminal perspective

Abstract: The offences regulated by the Law No 31/1990 on companies form a domain relatively little explored by the criminal law specialists and quasi-unexplored by the civil law specialists. This study deals with those offences grouped within Article 273. These offences have a few specific elements. First, the active subject of the legal rule hypothesis is qualified, namely a person that holds a certain quality [vezi tot]

Vizualizări 167

Infracțiunile prevăzute în art. 2721 din Legea nr. 31/1990 privind societățile. Comentarii din perspectiva mixtă civilă (raporturi juridice între profesioniști) – penală

Autor: Sebastian BODU, Ciprian BODU

Publicat în: Revista Dreptul nr.5/2016

Disponibil onlineaici.

Titlul lucrării în engleză: Offences provided in Article 2721 of the Law No 31/1990 on companies. Comments from the mixed civil (legal relationships between professionals) – criminal perspective

Abstract: The offences provided by the Law No 31/1990 on companies form a domain relatively little explored by the criminal law specialists and quasi-unexplored by the civil law specialists. This study deals with the two offences grouped within Article 2721. These offences have a few specific elements. First, the active subject in the legal rule hypothesis is qualified, namely a person that holds a certain [vezi tot]

Vizualizări 283

Considerații privind aplicarea Deciziei Curții Constituționale nr. 405/2016 în practica judiciară

Autor: Maxim DOBRINOIU
Publicat în:
Revista Dreptul nr. 7/2019
Revistă disponibilă online:
aici
Abstract
: By Decision No 405/2016, the Romanian Constitutional Court (CCR) ruled that the provisions of Article 297 (1) of the Criminal Code (misfeasance in office or misconduct in office) are constitutional only if the sentence „fulfils wrongfully” has the meaning of „fulfils by breaching the law”. However, in more than two years from the publication of this Constitutional Court Decision, it is worth to notice that the jurisprudence of the criminal courts knows diametrically opposed interpretations. In one opinion, the [vezi tot]

Vizualizări 215