Competența organelor judiciare | Page 5

Parchetul European, de azi, o certitudine

Parchetul European, Competența organelor judiciare, Competența procurorului, Participanții în procesul penal, Drept procesual penal

Autor: Ligia-Valentina Mirișam

Publicat în: Revista Universul Juridic nr.10/2017

Disponibil online: aici.

Abstract: The idea of an European Public Prosecutor is not at all a new one, yet it almost got to be
considered an illusion by many great authors of Criminal Law. We believed in it from the very
beginning as we thought that EPPO is a meeting point between national criminal law and the
European one. Due to a disastruos balance sheet that shows that European citizens are being
annually affected by a prejudice of over 50 billion Euros, in times of economic crisis and budgetary
restriction, it is more important than ever [vezi tot]

0 Vizualizări 245

Exercitarea acțiunii civile din oficiu în procesul penal

Competența organelor judiciare, Participanții în procesul penal, Drept procesual penal

Autor: Ioana PĂCURARIU

Publicat în: Revista Universul Juridic nr. 12/2015

Disponibil online: aici.

Titlul lucrării în engleză: The exercise of civil action ex officio in the criminal proceedings

Abstract: The present article shows that the bringing of the civil action is done when the fully legally competent individual or company or their successors bring a civil action.

Usually, an injured party may choose whether or not to bring civil action, however there are limitation cases foreseen by article 19 section 3 of the New Criminal Procedure Code when the civil action is brought ex officio, when the injured party lacks the legal competency, or has a [vezi tot]

0 Vizualizări 153

On the limits and consequences of the case splitting in the Romanian criminal procedure system

Competența organelor judiciare, Disjungerea cauzei de către procuror, Competența procurorului, Participanții în procesul penal, Drept procesual penal

Autor: Andrei ZARAFIU, Radu SLĂVOIU
Publicat în: Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 2019
Disponibil online: aici.
Abstract: In the Romanian criminal justice system, the framework or procedural context in which one of the two main judicial functions is exercised – dealing with essential elements of the conflict report – is not fixed but flexible. The current study aims to analyze some of the procedural manifestations of case splitting, one of the legally accepted operations that have as purpose to modify the procedural framework. The analysis seeks to identify not only the [vezi tot]

0 Vizualizări 169

Issues regarding the jurisdiction in case of joining the criminal cases

Reunirea cauzelor, Competența organelor judiciare, Participanții în procesul penal, Drept procesual penal

Autor: Dan LUPAȘCU, Mihai MAREȘ
Publicat în: Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 2019
Disponibil online: aici.
Abstract: The joinder of criminal cases determines a prorogation of material or territorial jurisdiction of the court or, as the case may be, of the prosecuting authority ensuring a proper performance of the legal activities. The current Code of Criminal Procedure regulates both the compulsory joinder and the optional joinder of the criminal cases, according to a summary proceedings, stipulated in article 45 (during the trial), and, respectively, article 63 paragraph (1) related to article 45 (during the criminal investigation). The concurrence [vezi tot]

0 Vizualizări 190

Sancțiunea care intervine în cazul în care se constată incompatibilitatea judecătorului

Competența organelor judiciare, Participanții în procesul penal, Incompatiblități, Drept procesual penal

Autor: Andreea-Diana Toma
Publicat în: Revista Themis nr. 1/2019
Disponibil online: aici
Cuvinte-cheie: incompatibilitate; judecător; sancțiune; nulitate.
…

[vezi tot]

1 Vizualizări 181