Autor: Dan Cristian TĂTAR
Publicat în: Revista Pro Lege nr. 3-4/2015
Disponibil online: aici.
Rezumat: Având în vedere amploarea cu care s-a dezvoltat fenomenul infracțional privind infracțiunea de contrabandă îndeosebi cu țigări nemarcate, marcate necorespunzător ori cu marcaje false ne-am propus în materialul de față să abordăm această problemă din perspectiva interpretării textului de lege din aliniatul (3) al art. 270 din Legea nr. 86/2006 privind Codul vamal al României.
Cuvinte-cheie: infracţiunea de contrabandă simplă.
Titlul lucrării în engleză: Discussions regarding the offence of simple contraband (assimilated version) provided by art. 270 par. (30) of Law no. 86/2006
Abstract: The author of this material presents important aspects of the crime of simple smuggling (assimilated variant) required by art. 270 of the. 3 of Law no. 86/2006.
During article refers to inconsistent judicial practice of prosecution in such situations and are used by final decisions of the Court of Appeal Timisoara.
It makes speech about Decision No. 17/2013 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice and the view of the author on the special quality of the active subject of the crime under debate, namely the authorized contractor to hold a tax warehouse are described in concise definitions of law in this context.
Also, the material is presented views expressed by the Criminal justice service of the Prosecutor’s Office attached to High Court of Cassation and Justice by note no. 6444/1720/III-13/2014 dated 05.19.2014 and concluded in accordance with the aforementioned note.
Finally bringing into question the fact that Romania’s general prosecutor has notified the Supreme Court to unravel the question of law on the notion of contraband.
Keywords: offence of simple contraband.
