Materiale asemănătoare

Autor: Dan MOROȘAN
Publicat în: Revista Dreptul nr. 5/2018
Revistă disponibilă: aici
Cuvinte-cheie: participație; participația necorespunzătoare; coautoratul; intentia de bază; legătura subiectivă; infracțiune; neglijenţă; lipsă de vinovăție; Nebentäterschaft; sistemul de sancționare;
Participation in case of acts committed with basic intent. Co-authorship and material-complementary plurality
Abstract: Accepting co-authorship in the commission of acts with basic intent has represented, sine die, a permanent struggle for scholars since the adoption of the 1968 Criminal Code. Both the literature and the judiciary have had divergent positions. In the present paper, the purpose is to assess all factors that can lead to a positive or negative answer to the question: Is co-authorship compatible with basic-intent? The analysis will be divided: the national status-quo versus the alternative solution, respectively the German one. In the national arena, the existing arguments and the foundations for the possible envisioned outcomes will be discussed. Within the German framework, the institution of Nebentäterschaft will be assessed in a comparative approach, underlying similarities and differences when compared to the Romanian framework. Finally, a personal note will be added to the mix.
Keywords: participation; improper participation; co-authorship; basic intent; subjective link; criminal offence; negligence; lack of guilt; Nebentäterschaft; sanctioning system;