DIN NOU DESPRE DECIZII NECONSTITUȚIONALE ALE ÎNALTEI CURȚI DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE –CHESTIUNI PROBLEMATICE ALE DECIZIEI ÎNALTEI CURȚI DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE NR.13/2017, PRONUNȚATĂ ÎN RECURS ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, REFERITOARE LA INTERPRETAREA ȘI APLICAREA DISPOZIȚIILOR ART.469 ALIN.(3) DIN CODUL DE PROCEDURĂ PENALĂ

Autor: Adrian-Constantin Tatar, Roxana-Tudorița Baban

Publicat în: Revista Dreptul nr. 2/2021

Rezumat disponibil online: aici.

Again about the unconstitutional decisions of the High Court of Cassation and Justice – problematic issues of the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 13/2017, pronounced on appeal in the interest of the law, referring to the interp

Abstract: The authors criticize the decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No. 13/2017 pronounced on appeal in the interest of the law, which had as its object the interpretation and application of the provisions art. No. 469, paragraph 3 of the criminal procedure code which is called the Judgment of the request for reopening the criminal process. The Constitutional Court decided that the decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No. 13/2017 violates the right to a fair trial and the right to defense of the person.

Keywords: the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 13/2017; the Criminal Procedure Code; the Constitutional Court; right to a fair trial; the right to defence;